OUGD501 - Evaluation

1.  What skills have you developed through this module and how effectively do you think you have applied them?

-       I have learnt much more about ways of researching, through the use of primary and secondary research, qualitative and quantitative.
-       The correct way to reference when referring to research, set by Harvard referencing standard.
-       Using trusted information sources, such as Google Scholar.
-       An ability to critically evaluate a brand identity, and analyse certain design decisions.
-       The overall ability to write well constructed and triangulated essays, based on careful analysis.
-       Grammar, spelling and punctuation.




2. What approaches to/methods of design production have you developed and how have they informed your design development process?

-       Working with different formats – For studio brief 2, I have worked with two formats that were new to me; an A5 publication and an A1 poster. I found both to be hugely beneficial. With an A5 publication, much has to be considered when working with space, as you don’t want the page to be too cluttered. Working on an A1 poster was difficult (as it needed to be viewed from distance as well as close up), meaning designing on a 15” laptop could not replicate it’s scale.
-       Binding – I learnt how to create a unique Japanase stab stitch bind, and the unique and craft based quality it can give to a publication.
-       Stock – I have learnt more about where stock can be sourced from, and innovate ways in which stock can break up a publication.





3. What strengths can you identify in your work and how have/will you capitalise on these?

-       Research – If I’m interested in the topic (I should be if I’ve chosen it), I really get into researching the topic. This means I have a great foundation to work with, meaning I can develop strong concepts that work well with the information.
-       Layout – I feel my ability to work with grids has hugely improved, which can mainly be seen with the A1 poster. I feel the information displayed on the poster was well considered and well communicated. I intend on experimenting with more infographics in the future, utilising type and grid. The same can be said for working with publications and layout.








4. What weaknesses can you identify in your work and how will you address these in the future?

Time management – If I’m honest, I should have been given more time to Studio Brief 2. I worked every waking minute at points of the project, meaning I left my self very little time for a break or time to relax. The outcome was better much better than I had expected or planned, and took the same amount of time as I expected. However, this wasn’t spread appropriately. In the future I shall continue to use a calendar to plan when I work, but be stricter on filling it in. 

Booking slots (photography & print) – This has been much less of a struggle than last year, but still something I need to consider. Ideally, I would like to get my work printed in the digital dungeon in the future, but slots at this time of year are booked over 3 weeks in advance. Next year I shall book print slots this early on, so I don’t have to use a printer outside of university.



5. Identify five things that you will do differently next time and what do you expect to gain from doing these?

Try to attend all of the studio sessions. In terms of lectures and seminars, I wasn’t bad with attendance. However, due to a serious family issue, I had to rush home and missed a briefing. Obviously this could not have been controlled, but I’m hoping an issue like this doesn’t crop up again!

Manage time better, meaning less stress, and the same amount of work.



6.How would you grade yourself on the following areas:
(please indicate using an ‘x’) 

5= excellent, 4 = very good, 3 = good, 2 = average, 1 = poor

1
2
3
4
5
Attendance



x

Punctuality


x


Motivation




x
Commitment




x
Quantity of work produced



x

Quality of work produced



x

Contribution to the group




x
The evaluation of your work is an important part of the assessment criteria and represents a percentage of the overall grade. It is essential that you give yourself enough time to complete your written evaluation fully and with appropriate depth and level of self-reflection. If you have any questions relating to the self evaluation process speak to a member of staff as soon as possible.



Wednesday, 7 May 2014
Categories: | Comments Off